Ok, finished with ALL the Biennale show.. the one at South Bridge definitely takes the cake. It was actually quite good! There’s a sense of the art sitting in with the environment, and the curation had a much better flow than the one at City Hall, or the one at Marina.. the one at Marine.. really, only the snow scene one is really awesome, too bad it’s too hot, which takes away from that one good exhibit.
South Bridge had Hemen’s work, which had a lot of coverage in the press over his ‘cursing and swearing’. I never knew Hemen to be such a person, but that was a long time ago, maybe he’s changed, or maybe situation has made him what he is. Having said that, I think the works really makes people think and feel. If some people just cannot think and feel, then maybe the works are really not ready for that person. Loved all his 5 (?) works.
The idea of how an artist is to be responsible to the audience, especially in a show as such as the Singapore Biennale came up when I was having a really late lunch with some friends.
“There has to be at least a hook for the audience to hold and get to understand the works better, right?”
“Maybe his response IS the hook?!”
“I’m in the education side, and I feel that an artist needs to explain their works.”
“People just want to understand the works”
“Yeah, but if by explaining the works makes the works less experiential, then how?”
“There must be some way of allowing the audience to learn about this, wan.”
“Yes, by speaking to the right people. There are artists who refuses to explain their works, allowing the audience to come to their own conclusion, and there are artists who must explain their works. For whatever reason, some because the works are too personal, some because it’s too obscure, or some because the blatantness hides the bigger truths behind the works. Whatever, but don’t give up just because you can’t find the answers, but rather, strive to find out through another person. And of course, any other person would not be able to access the kind of clarity that the artists will have, but it is nonetheless, an interpretation that will allow the mind to wander and perhaps see another side to the works, right?”
There is much more.. but well, just to give myself a reminder of how a conversation can go in a different direction that can cement my own thoughts about how art should be viewed and understood. :P
Anyways… my fav, has to be the one of the swing made up of light tubes.. wah lau.. deep and pretty all at once. kewl. Even the drooning sound was implicit! I wan one!