have you seen him laugh like that?
Friday, July 31st, 2009Almost great conversation, and I say almost only because we didn’t have time or more beer, or whatever that people these days need to get it going! ha. I’d almost forgotten about how he looked like when he was truly laughing! It was good catching up some!
Anyway, the reason why I started this post with a portrait was because I thought that it’s about time I made some comments about the audience that came for my ‘on fingerbowls and hankies’ exhibition.
During my official opening, I had some guests come over and asked about why I didn’t make the people in the photo look good? And by looking good, they meant, smiling, without wrinkles or blemishes. I was a little stumped, not by the question, but rather by the fact that there are still people out there who still believes that a portrait of a person needs to be one where the sitter is at his / her best.
Now, I can understand why in the past, it was important to capture people at their best! Photography was precious, then. People would dress up just to be photographed. But now? Even in the context of an art exhibition? Gosh, it is certainly not new that people don’t look their best in their portraits, just look at the self-portrait that Vincent van Gogh painted of himself!
And let’s just look at the concept of the person looking their best. When I photograph a person, I’d really like to photograph what’s there in front of me, so, for the purpose of a representative image, the person would look best being themselves, or being the person I feel and know. If they happen to be really sad, I would photograph them with sadness in their eyes. For me, that’s the person looking their best.
In this case, my friend had a good time, but the weight on his shoulders does not escape his eyes.
